May 26, 2022 —
On April 12, 2022, the Divisional Court of Ontario released a seminal decision regarding the rights of persons with disabilities in accessing paratransit services. This decision is significant because it is a rare judicial pronouncement on how accessibility legislation must be interpreted and applied. The Divisional Court decision made several important findings. First, it affirmed […]
ARCH Blog The ARCH Blog explores topics on disability law, the legal profession, and matters that may fall in between.
To receive ARCH Blog posts as soon as they’re published, subscribe to the ARCH Blog at our homepage.
The ARCH Blog explores topics on disability law, the legal profession, and matters that may fall in between.
To receive ARCH Blog posts as soon as they’re published, subscribe to the ARCH Blog at our homepage.
April 14, 2022 —
Let’s Chat… About Inclusive Education – Episode 12 Ft. Roberto Lattanzio In this “Let’s Chat… about Inclusive Education” the hosts speak with Roberto Lattanzio. He discusses – supporting families, the inconsistencies in education policy, and the groundswell needed for change. The episode is below:
April 12, 2021 —
Case Summary and Analysis: JL v Empower Simcoe, 2021 HRTO 222 - First decision about human rights during the COVID-19 pandemic
March 27, 2020 —
Ontario puts in place emergency measures for administrative tribunals in response to COVID-19, including enacting Hearings in Tribunal Proceedings (Temporary Measures) Act, 2020, and suspending limitation and other procedural time periods.
February 27, 2020 —
Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario releases decision about public disclosure of adjudicative records and confidentiality orders
December 23, 2019 —
Canadian Human Rights Commission Releases Rules for its Process
October 24, 2019 —
This post sets out the background of Matson and Andrews, and some of the concerns raised by persons with disabilities and other equity-seeking groups with respect to access to justice. It then highlights one case, Reed v Province of Nova Scotia (Department of Environment) (Reed), which applies Matson and Andrews in a way that does not operate as a complete bar to human rights challenges to the wording of a statute.
August 29, 2019 —
An analysis of the consequences of differing tests for family status discrimination amongst Canadian jurisdictions, and discussion of the troubling re-introduction of the distinction between direct and indirect discrimination.
July 18, 2019 —
Divisional Court confirms that a contextual, human rights analysis is required where a person with an addictions disability is terminated.
June 28, 2019 —
Practice tips to secure accommodations clients need and ensure that they can participate in the administrative process in a meaningful way.